Guides

Why Shaftless Butterfly Technology?

May 13, 2026

Close-up of AT Power Throttles Silver shaftless butterfly valve for efficient flow control.

AT Power’s patented Shaftless technology explained and measured. We simulated our own production CAD against a conventional shafted throttle to show exactly what a shaft costs you.

In 2005 we revolutionised butterfly throttle design with our patented Shaftless technology, removing the butterfly throttle’s one real weakness: the shaft sitting in the airway. Butterfly throttles are unbeatable for idle stability, part-throttle control and mechanical simplicity - which is why they run everywhere from club motorsport to Formula One. But a conventional butterfly pays a permanent price for that simplicity, at every throttle opening.

The problem with a conventional butterfly

A traditional butterfly carries its blade on a metal shaft running straight across the centre of the bore while being held in by exposed screws. It sits there whether the throttle is shut, cruising or wide open. Air cannot pass through it, so it has to squeeze around it, accelerate, and then tumble back together on the far side. That tumbling is turbulence which is energy your engine spent pulling the air in is thrown away as churn, instead of being delivered to the cylinders.

CFD tracer arrows: behind the shaft the air stalls and reverses; the shaftless bore streams straight past the blade
Tracer arrows carried by the simulated airflow. Behind the shaft (top) air stalls and actually reverses direction; the Shaftless bore (bottom) streams straight past the blade.

What the simulation shows

We took the production CAD for our 50 mm throttle body - ram-pipe, housing and blade - sliced it at the bore centreline and ran a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of both designs under identical conditions. The only difference between the two cases is the shaft.

Stagnant-air comparison: 89 mm² of dead air behind the shaft versus 18 mm² shaftless
The red area is stagnant air - bore area doing no work. The shaft leaves five times as much of it.
  • 5x less dead air in the bore core than a shafted throttle
  • 29% extra pressure loss a shaft adds across the valve
  • 15% extra pressure drop a shaft needs for the same airflow
  • 99.5% of open-bore airflow, measured on the flow bench
Difference map of the two flow fields showing the airflow lost in the shaft's shadow
The difference between the two flow fields. Red is airflow the shaft has taken away. This leaves up to twice the inlet velocity as lost.
CFD valve cycle: the blade sweeping from closed to wide open and back, shafted versus shaftless
A full valve cycle, closed to wide open and back. The shaft disrupts the flow at every angle - and note how much harder the air has to work through the closing phase.
Two line charts: airflow through the valve cycle, and airflow against blade opening angle. The Shaftless trace sits above the Shafted trace throughout both.
Airflow through the full valve cycle and against opening angle - the Shaftless valve (green) flows more air at every angle. View full size

The Shaftless solution

Our award-winning design supports the blade from its rim, taking the shaft and screws out of the airway completely.

Slow-air view: the shaft leaves a large dead zone of stalled air, the shaftless bore almost none
The same flow with the colour scale clipped to the slow air - everything above 55% of inlet speed is red, so only air that is struggling shows up. The shaft’s dark dead zone is flow the engine never gets to use.
  • Ultra-thin blade - knife-edged leading and trailing edges minimise separation
  • No shaft or screws in the bore - nothing left in the airway but the blade’s edge
  • Near open-bore flow - 99.5% of the airflow of a completely open bore

It matters most on smaller throttles

A shaft’s diameter is set by stiffness, not by bore size - so it eats a proportionally larger share of a small bore. That is exactly where high-performance individual throttle bodies live.

Shaft blockage and added valve loss by throttle bore. The 50 mm row is simulated; the other two are scaling estimates anchored to it.
Throttle boreShaft blockageAdded loss across the valve
40 mm~30%~ +43%
50 mm (simulated)24%+29%
70 mm~17%~ +17%

Or spend the gain the other way: a Shaftless throttle flows like a conventional throttle one to two sizes larger. You can fit a smaller bore for higher intake velocity and sharper part-throttle response, with no loss of top-end flow.

What this means for your engine

  • Up to 10% more airflow than a conventional throttle of the same size
  • More usable power - at wide-open throttle, roughly 1% more airflow supports 1% more torque
  • Cleaner air delivery - no shaft wake means a more uniform charge into the manifold, better cylinder-to-cylinder distribution and cleaner airflow-sensor signals
  • Smaller, lighter throttles that outperform larger conventional systems

Proven where it matters

Combined with our in-house R&D on inlet geometry and precision CNC manufacturing, Shaftless technology is trusted from road-going builds to Formula One, WEC and WRC.

Find Your Throttle Bodies Talk To Our Team

Simulation figures from a 2-D lattice-Boltzmann study of the 50 mm throttle body at the bore centreline, shafted vs shaftless run like-for-like with the shaft as the only variable. Figures isolate the shaft alone and are conservative of the complete Shaftless design. Bore-size figures other than 50 mm are scaling estimates anchored to the simulation. Flow-bench figures (99.5% open-bore, up to 10% airflow) from AT Power product testing.

Share

More Guides